Mislav Kolakusic – a Member of the European Parliament, just called WHO a terrorist organisation!
Find out why Kolakusic called WHO a terrorist organisation, and what the facts really are!
Mislav Kolakusic : WHO Is A Terrorist Organisation!
People are sharing video clips on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and TikTok which shows Mislav Kolakusic – a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) calling the WHO (World Health Organisation) a terrorist organisation.
The Gateway Pundit also posted an article on Mislav Kolakusic declaring the WHO as a terrorist organisation, which are being shared by anti-vaccination activists and conspiracy theorists.
The MEP said that while voicing his opposition to an upcoming agreement which would allegedly give WHO the “sole authority to declare pandemics and acquire vaccines and drugs”. Here is a transcript of his video.
Recommended : Why International COVID Summit III Criticised Vaccine!
Truth : Mislav Kolakusic Is Wrong, WHO Is Not Terrorist Organisation
This is yet another example of MISINFORMATION created and spread by politicians and/or conspiracy theorists / anti-vaccination activists, and here are the reasons why…
Fact #1 : It Was Not A Deep Fake Video
First, let me just point out that this is not a deep fake video. Mislav Kolakusic (Mislav Kolakušić) did indeed call for the WHO to be declared a terrorist organisation.
That video came from his official press conference which he posted on his Twitter account on May 22, 2023. It has been viewed by over 1.1 million people to date.
Fact #2 : Mislav Kolakusic Is A Controversial Politician
Mislav Kolakusic was elected as a Croatian independent Member of the European Parliament (MEP) in May 2019. Since then, he has been a controversial politician.
In January 2022, he compared COVID-19 vaccine mandates with capital punishment, claiming that tens of thousands of people died from vaccines citing data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). In response, the EMA said that the cited EudraVigilance data was a public, self-reporting system (like VAERS) which require investigation to prove a causal link. Even more damning, the EudraVigilance data did not report deaths, contradicting Kolakusic’s claims.
In March 2022, Kolakusic criticised Canada’s response to vaccine mandate protests, saying that Canada now resembled more like a “dictatorship of the worst kind”.
In October 2022, Kolakusic claimed that there was a lack of disclosure of vaccine ingredients, saying, “no one in the world, except maybe 2 or 3 people, knows what it contains”, and called it “the biggest corruption scandal in the history of mankind”. However, we do know what COVID-19 vaccines contain, and there has not been any evidence of any corruption scandal surrounding any COVID-19 vaccine so far.
Fact #3 : No Evidence WHO Lied About COVID-19 / Vaccines
There is no evidence that the WHO lied about the COVID-19 pandemic or the COVID-19 vaccines. The truth is:
- SARS-CoV-2 was a new coronavirus when it was discovered in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, and
- the COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing deaths and hospitalisation.
In fact, the world has reopened up after many people were vaccinated against COVID-19, preventing massive waves of hospitalisations and deaths.
Mislav Kolakusic notably did not offer any evidence that the WHO lied, when he called for it to be labelled as a terrorist organisation.
Recommended : Did US Intentionally Release COVID Virus In Wuhan?!
Fact #4 : WHO Agreement Was Initiated By World Leaders
Mislav Kolakusic’s claims are based on a WHO agreement which started with not with WHO itself, but its member states, which wanted to amend the existing International Health Regulations to strengthen the world’s preparedness against future global pandemics.
The International Health Regulations (IHR) were first adopted by member states in 1969, empowering the WHO to monitor global diseases. Those regulations have since been revised over the years, including in 2005 – after the SARS outbreak.
On 1 December 2021, world leaders agreed to kickstart the process to draft and negotiate an agreement or convention to “strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response“.
Fact #5 : Recommendations Came From WHO Member States
The proposed recommendations came from WHO member states, and not WHO itself. Among the more than 200 recommendations on how to better prepare for the next pandemic were:
- sharing of data and genomic sequences on emerging viruses
- a plan for equitable vaccine distribution
- a ban on wildlife markets
- incentives for reporting new viruses or variants
Fact #6 : Some Countries Don’t Want A Binding Agreement
The European Union has proposed that the changes be adopted as a new treaty, which would be binding. This is perhaps what Mislav Kolakusic was so agitated about, but this was an EU proposal, not a WHO proposal.
The United States, on the other hand, has opposed a binding treaty. India and Brazil are similarly reluctant about adopting a treaty.
Recommended : Is Biden Admin signing over US sovereignty to WHO?!
Fact #7 : No Country Is Signing Over Its Sovereignty To WHO
The zero draft (PDF download) of the proposed WHO agreement on preparing for future pandemics even addresses the issue of national sovereignty on Article 4 (3):
Anyone who read the zero draft can clearly see that even the “draft” has clarified that no country is signing over its national sovereignty to the WHO.
Fact #8 : WHO DG Dismissed Sovereignty Claim In May 2022
On May 17, 2022, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus dismissed the claim that countries signing up for this new agreement would be giving up their sovereignty.
Please help us fight fake news – SHARE this article, and SUPPORT our work!
- Do Amaravalli Flowers Look Like Birds?!
- Did US Intentionally Release COVID Virus In Wuhan?!
- Did Prince Harry Hire A New Divorce Lawyer?!
- Are COVID-19 Vaccines Still One Giant Experiment?!
- Did Morgan Freeman Just Die Suddenly From Cancer?!
If you like our work, please support us by visiting our sponsors, or donating to our fund. Thank you!